For business leaders
Curious about the revenue you're missing from organic search?
See how Similar AI turns search data into profitable growth (no API knowledge required).
Why the GSC API matters (and why it fails at scale)
Google Search Console is the only source of truth for how Google sees your site. It tells you which queries drive traffic, how pages rank, and where opportunities exist. The web UI works fine for small sites, but for enterprise SEO, you need the API: to automate reporting, integrate with analytics systems, and build custom tools.
The problem? The API has a hard limit: 50,000 page-keyword pairs per property per day. The web UI is even worse, capping exports at just 1,000 rows.
For large e-commerce sites with hundreds of thousands of pages, this means you're making decisions based on a fraction of your actual search performance data.
Measuring the sampling gap
The “sampling gap” is the difference between clicks and impressions from keyword-page pairs retrieved via the API versus site-level totals. Our research across multiple enterprise sites revealed the scale of the problem.
Impressions missed
Large sites lose approximately two-thirds of their impression data to API sampling limits.
Keywords invisible
Product-led SEO teams miss approximately 90% of their keyword data when relying on standard API access.
Daily row limit
The hard API quota: 50,000 page-keyword pairs per GSC property per day, regardless of your site size.
Product SEO sites with deep category hierarchies are hit hardest. Some directory sections show zero data because all 50K rows are consumed by higher-traffic pages.
What missing data means for SEO
Incomplete GSC data doesn't just mean inaccurate reports. It undermines every data-driven SEO initiative.
A/B testing fails
When you can't see the full impact of changes, experiments show inconclusive results. You might abandon winning strategies or scale losing ones.
ROI calculations are wrong
If you're only seeing a fraction of your traffic, you're undervaluing SEO investment. Budget decisions get made on incomplete information.
Long-tail opportunities hidden
The keywords you're missing are typically long-tail queries with high purchase intent. These are exactly the terms worth optimising for.
Category gaps go unnoticed
Deep product categories may show zero data, making it impossible to identify which sections need attention or have growth potential.
Solution 1: Multiple GSC properties
The most effective workaround for the 50K limit is creating multiple GSC properties, each covering a different section of your site. Since each property has its own 50K daily quota, you multiply your data access.
In our testing, adding 50 GSC properties (segmented by directory path) reduced impression loss from 67% to just 11%, and increased keyword capture by 13.7x.
How to segment
- Create properties for major category paths:
/electronics/,/clothing/ - Add sub-directory properties for high-volume sections
- Verify each property in Search Console
- Query each property separately and merge results
The trade-off: setup complexity and maintenance overhead. You'll need scripts to manage verification, query multiple properties, and deduplicate results.
Solution 2: BigQuery bulk export
Google offers a bulk data export feature that sends GSC data directly to BigQuery. This bypasses the API's row limits entirely.
How it works
In Search Console settings, you can enable “Bulk data export” to a Google Cloud BigQuery dataset. Data is exported daily with historical backfill available.
What you get
All your query data, not just the top 50K rows. Query-level detail including clicks, impressions, position, and CTR. Page-level breakdowns. Country and device segmentation.
Limitations
Requires a Google Cloud account. Data exports have a 2-3 day delay. Privacy filtering still removes low-volume queries. Storage and query costs apply.
Sample BigQuery SQL
SELECT query, page, SUM(clicks) as total_clicks, SUM(impressions) as impressions, AVG(position) as avg_position FROM `project.searchconsole.searchdata` WHERE data_date >= DATE_SUB(CURRENT_DATE(), INTERVAL 28 DAY) GROUP BY query, page ORDER BY impressions DESC LIMIT 100000
Query up to 100,000 rows or more; no API limits apply.
Solution 3: AI-powered GSC access via MCP
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is transforming how SEO teams interact with GSC data, using AI assistants instead of dashboards and scripts.
What is MCP?
MCP is an open protocol created by Anthropic that enables AI assistants to connect to external data sources. Think of it as a standardised way for AI tools to access your business systems.
For GSC, this means you can ask Claude or other AI assistants questions like “show me declining keywords this month” and get immediate analysis, without exporting CSVs or switching tools.
Available MCP servers
- mcp-server-gsc: Up to 25K rows per request, ROI calculations, regex filtering
- mcp-gsc: 19 tools including batch URL inspection and data visualisation
- Google's official servers: Official MCP support announced December 2025
What MCP doesn't fix
MCP servers still hit the underlying GSC API, so the 50K daily limit applies. However, they make strategic querying easier: you can ask for specific segments, apply filters intelligently, and avoid wasting rows on data you don't need. Some servers support up to 25K rows per request (vs. the default 1K), maximising what you get from each query.
Beyond keywords: topic-centric SEO
The sampling gap forces a strategic question: do you really need every keyword, or do you need to understand topics?
With 13.7x more keywords captured using comprehensive data access, you have enough signal for machine learning. LLMs can perform Named Entity Recognition on your keyword data, clustering thousands of queries into meaningful topics.
This shifts SEO from chasing individual keywords to understanding user intent at scale. Instead of optimising for “blue velvet sofa under 2000” as a single keyword, you optimize for the topic cluster around “budget velvet sofas”, capturing variations you'd never find manually.
Topic-centric analysis is more actionable than exhaustive keyword tracking, and it's achievable even with sampling gaps.
Which solution is right for you?
Each approach has trade-offs. Here's how to choose based on your situation.
Multiple properties
Best for
Large sites with clear directory structures. Teams with engineering capacity. When you need maximum keyword coverage.
Watch out for
Setup complexity. Ongoing maintenance. Need for deduplication scripts.
Impact
67% → 11% data loss. 13.7x keyword increase.
BigQuery export
Best for
Teams already using Google Cloud. Historical analysis. Joining GSC data with other datasets.
Watch out for
2-3 day data delay. Storage costs. Privacy filtering still applies.
Impact
No row limits. Full historical data. SQL flexibility.
MCP integration
Best for
Quick analysis without dashboards. Natural language queries. Teams adopting AI assistants.
Watch out for
Still subject to 50K limit. Requires AI assistant setup. Early-stage ecosystem.
Impact
89% faster analysis. Conversational data access. Up to 25K rows per request.
How Similar AI uses GSC data
Similar AI integrates directly with Google Search Console to identify gaps between search demand and your current pages. We don't just pull keyword data; we use it to find pages you're missing.
The research engine analyzes your GSC data alongside competitor rankings, product feeds, and market data to identify high-value page opportunities. The page creation agent then builds those pages automatically.
For internal linking, we use GSC position data to identify pages ranking in positions 4-15 (within striking distance of page one) and boost them with strategic links from higher-authority pages.
Frequently asked questions
What exactly is the 50,000 row limit?
The GSC API allows you to retrieve up to 50,000 page-keyword pairs per day per property. If you request data broken down by query + page + country + device, each unique combination counts toward this limit. For a large site, you'll hit this limit quickly.
Does the BigQuery export have the same limit?
No. BigQuery bulk export bypasses the API entirely. You get all your GSC data exported daily, limited only by BigQuery's storage and query capabilities. However, Google's privacy filtering still applies, so very low-volume queries may still be omitted.
What happened to Google's URL Parameters tool?
Google deprecated the URL Parameters tool in GSC in 2024. This was separate from the API limits issue. The recommendation now is to handle parameter management server-side through robots.txt and canonical tags.
How do MCP servers help with the sampling gap?
MCP servers don't increase the 50K limit, but they make accessing GSC data much faster. Instead of building custom scripts or navigating dashboards, you can ask an AI assistant for specific analyzes. Some servers support 25K rows per request (vs. the default 1K), so you use fewer requests to get the same data.
Should I set up multiple GSC properties?
If you have a large site and need comprehensive keyword data, yes. The setup effort pays off quickly for sites with 100K+ pages. For smaller sites or if you're mainly doing high-level analysis, BigQuery export or topic-centric approaches may be more practical.
What's the minimum data I need for topic clustering?
Topic clustering works better with more data, but even the standard 50K rows can provide useful signals if you focus on your highest-traffic sections. The key is having enough keyword variations to identify patterns and user intent.
Related capabilities
How Similar AI helps you act on GSC insights.
See what's possible with better search insights
When you can identify what customers are actually searching for, the results speak for themselves.
Stop missing search demand. Start creating pages.
Similar AI connects to your GSC data to find the pages you're missing, then creates them with the content and internal links that drive results.